ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Evaluating instrumental activities of daily living (IADL) is an important part of procedure to diagnose dementia. The Korean-Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (K-IADL) has been used extensively in Korea. However, its cut-off score has not been reformulated since 2002. The purpose of this study was to yield a new optimal cut-off score for the K-IADL and confirm the validity of this new cut-off score with various dementia groups. METHODS: We retrospectively collected a total of 2,347 patients' K-IADL data from 6 general hospitals in Korea. These patients had mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or dementia with various etiologies for cognitive impairment. We also recruited a normal control group (n=254) from the community. Korean-Mini Mental State Examination, Short version of the Geriatric Depression Scale, Clinical Dementia Rating, and Global Deterioration Scale were administered to all participants. Caregivers completed K-IADL and Barthel Index. RESULTS: K-IADL scores were significantly different among dementia subgroups, but not significantly different among MCI subgroups. Based on internal consistency, correlations with other scales, and factor analysis, K-IADL showed excellent reliability and validity. The new optimal cut-off score to diagnose dementia was 0.40, which gave a sensitivity of 0.901 and a specificity of 0.916. Positive predictive value for dementia using the new cut-off score was 94.2% for Alzheimer's disease, 100% for vascular dementia, and 84% for Parkinson's disease. CONCLUSIONS: Our results illustrate that the new K-IADL cut-off score of 0.40 is reliable and valid for screening impairments of daily functioning resulting from various etiologies.
Subject(s)
Humans , Activities of Daily Living , Alzheimer Disease , Caregivers , Cognition Disorders , Dementia , Dementia, Vascular , Depression , Hospitals, General , Korea , Mass Screening , Cognitive Dysfunction , Parkinson Disease , Reproducibility of Results , Retrospective Studies , Sensitivity and Specificity , Weights and MeasuresABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Comprehensive neuropsychological tests are important in the diagnosis and follow-up of patients with MCI; however, most were developed without consideration of illiteracy. We developed the Literacy Independent Cognitive Assessment (LICA) as a comprehensive neuropsychological assessment battery applicable to older adults who are either literate or illiterate. This study aimed to assess the reliability and validity of the LICA for diagnosis of MCI. METHODS: Normal controls (n=634) and patients with MCI (n=128) were recruited from 13 centers were included in this study. Participants were divided into illiterate or literate groups, based on their performance on a brief reading and writing test. The LICA, Korean Mini-Mental State Examination (K-MMSE), and Seoul Neuropsychological Screening Battery (SNSB) were administered. RESULTS: Total LICA scores distinguished MCI patients from controls (p<0.001). They were closely and positively correlated to the K-MMSE scores (r=0.632, p<0.001) but negatively correlated to clinical dementia rating (CDR) (r=-0.358, p<0.001) and CDR sum of boxes (r=-0.339, p<0.001). Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for patients with MCI by total LICA score was 0.827 (0.783-0.870), superior to that presented by the K-MMSE. For the classification of MCI subtypes, inter-method reliability of LICA with the SNSB was good (kappa 0.773; 0.679-0.867, p<0.001). CONCLUSION: The results of this study show that the LICA may be reliably used to distinguish MCI patients from cognitively intact adults, to identify MCI subtypes and monitor progression toward dementia, regardless of illiteracy.
Subject(s)
Adult , Humans , Classification , Dementia , Diagnosis , Literacy , Follow-Up Studies , Mass Screening , Cognitive Dysfunction , Neuropsychological Tests , Reproducibility of Results , ROC Curve , Sensitivity and Specificity , Seoul , WritingABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The Literacy-Independent Cognitive Assessment (LICA) has been developed for a diagnosis of dementia and is a useful neuropsychological test battery for illiterate populations as well as literate populations. The objective of this study was to develop the short form of the LICA (S-LICA) and to evaluate the reliability and validity of the S-LICA. METHODS: The subtests of the S-LICA were selected based on the factor analysis and validation study results of the LICA. Patients with dementia (n=101) and normal elderly controls (n=185) participated in this study. RESULTS: Cronbach's coefficient alpha of the S-LICA was 0.92 for illiterate subjects and 0.94 for literate subjects, and the item-total correlation ranged from 0.63 to 0.81 (p<.01).The test-retest reliability of the S-LICA total score was high (r=0.94, p<.001), and the subtests had high test-retest reliabilities (r=0.68-0.87, p<.01). The correlation between the K-MMSE and S-LICA total scores were substantial in both the illiterate subjects (r=0.837, p<.001) and the literate subjects(r=0.802, p<.001). The correlation between the S-LICA and LICA was very high (r=0.989, p<.001). The area under the curve of the receiver operating characteristic was 0.999 for the literate subjects and 0.985 for the illiterate subjects. The sensitivity and specificity of the S-LICA for a diagnosis of dementia were 97% and 96% at the cutoff point of 72 for the literate subjects, and 96% and 93% at the cutoff point of 68 for the illiterate subjects, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that the S-LICA is a reliable and valid instrument for quick evaluation of patients with dementia in both illiterate and literate elderly populations.